Ban appeal

[never121 0]

1) marco

2)178.32.139.220:28960

3) 613c15f9

4) not appear

5) suspect wh

6) i play 10 min and i have been banned for wh. I don't know what to say.

[Lookout 1,479]

Hey marco/never121,

@savior banned you. The demo you can look at here.

I'll watch it this evening as soon as I have time for it.

Until then, including other member's opinions, I would like you to remain patient.

Thank you.

[savior 0]

I still feel the same. Even after watching this with wallhack, I feel the same.

[never121 0]

"I still feel the same. Even after watching this with wallhack, I feel the same" this doesn't mean anything.

post your timetable so i can answer

[Lookout 1,479]

Have to say, insuficient proof with an opinion of not hacking.

Kills are conclusive with sound and IQ (solely based on demo).

I'm afraid a mistake was made here. He shall be unbanned (after more opinions are given)

Currently a draw: 1 vote ban (savior) and 1 vote unban (myself)

[savior 0]

Have to say, insuficient proof with an opinion of not hacking.

Kills are conclusive with sound and IQ (solely based on demo).

I'm afraid a mistake was made here. He shall be unbanned (after more opinions are given)

Currently a draw: 1 vote ban (savior) and 1 vote unban (myself)

Whatever, I will unban him and get more proof, as this will undoubtedly happen anyways. Seems like many people are being unbanned these days because not enough admins agree that they should be banned.

[savior 0]

Unbanned, close thread please.

[Lookout 1,479]

Lookout wrote:

Have to say, insuficient proof with an opinion of not hacking.

Kills are conclusive with sound and IQ (solely based on demo).

I'm afraid a mistake was made here. He shall be unbanned (after more opinions are given)

Currently a draw: 1 vote ban (savior) and 1 vote unban (myself)

Whatever, I will unban him and get more proof, as this will undoubtedly happen anyways. Seems like many people are being unbanned these days because not enough admins agree that they should be banned.

Come on man, I just gave my opinion on this ban based on the proof provided. This is nothing personal. No need to open a new discussion about admins agreeing on bans.

[savior 0]

Lookout wrote:

Have to say, insuficient proof with an opinion of not hacking.

Kills are conclusive with sound and IQ (solely based on demo).

I'm afraid a mistake was made here. He shall be unbanned (after more opinions are given)

Currently a draw: 1 vote ban (savior) and 1 vote unban (myself)

Whatever, I will unban him and get more proof, as this will undoubtedly happen anyways. Seems like many people are being unbanned these days because not enough admins agree that they should be banned.

Come on man, I just gave my opinion on this ban based on the proof provided. This is nothing personal. No need to open a new discussion about admins agreeing on bans.

This has nothing to do with you.

[sam00 0]

Closed as requested.