Blandum

Former Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    362

  • Donations

    0.00 EUR 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Blandum

  6. Posted

    The end of message is so sad... You Must stay sometimes online on steam PsyDuck! I hope you will have fun in anything you'll do ^^

    Keep in touch with us! (this isn't a farewell)

    P. S nab I will miss you

  7. Posted · Report reply

    Yesterday with the name #Mongolo

    [attach=2754][/attach]

    P.S What you said me is false maybe, I think that Moose doesn't support you too. Oh, watch also this screenshot, before you were banned for banhopping with the name FAKE Cheesie.

    [attach=2756][/attach]

    Roccat konedriver aimassist?

  8. Posted · Report reply

    Okay, I will take all your suggestions ^^

    EDIT: So in the end I take my decision and I decided to buy the Gtx960. I won't write a lot of things because I have to test it better. But my first impressions are very good. The temperature had reach never 50° (and I'm using a very bad cpu) the performance in all games now are much more better(now I can finally play BF4). The only bad things I founded are:

    1. It's a my fault, but my screen it's too old for my new graphic card, so it can't gives its 100% about quality

    2. The Nvidia programms are very slow and sometimes they give me some lag. Also in the beginning it can't download drivers by itself, so I had to go in their website

    For the moment I am really safisfied about it :)

  9. Posted · Report reply

    *Bump*

    So guys, one of my friends send me an interesting article on Tom's hardware-->http://www.tomshw.it/news/directx-12-e-ashes-of-the-singularity-nuova-lotta-tra-amd-e-nvidia-69550 (it is in italian). In few words it says that Nvidia cards, whose should support directX 12, they don't do. The cause is that Maxwell hasn't Async Compute, so if you watch the image on the mid [attach=2742][/attach] you will see that FPS on GTX 980(Nvidia), in a game alpha Ashes of Singularity, goes down with directX 12, instead r9 performs very well. So I will wait new texts about this argument before buy a new graphic card.

    P.S However I have clear ideas about what to buy: If this article will denied maybe I will but the GTX 950, if not, R9 (I don't know if 270,280,290, I will see how the price will be)

    So, what do you think about it? Have you heard that?

  17. Posted · Report reply

    Yea, it's a bit slower. However I found a EVGA gtx 950 in another site, and yes, as Joker and you posted, it' cost 170 euro.

    If Nvidia:

    GTX 950: tweakers.net/pricewatch/459124…ed+-acx-20/specificaties/

    But Has someone got a product of EVGA? Is it good? I saw on google is quite good as manufacturer.

  18. Posted · Report reply

    Well let us know your decision. I need a new one as well. Which must especially have a displayport because I'm atm. limited in monitor resolution because of lack of this.

    Of course ;) For the moment I have some doubts, GTX 950 seems perfect, but in Amazon( where I should buy) it cost 185-200 euro and money aren't mine, but of my parents, and I don't want to spend much than 170(170 is still high). So as @TreeFrog said, I also saw the 750ti, it seems very nice, is a Nvidia, great performance and the price it's okay (140); R7 370 seems also great as performance(but an AMD). My search continues :thumbup:

  20. Posted · Report reply

    Thanks a lot @QueNNch :D

    PS: Ignore the Memory bus 256 or 128 bit. They are just channels, which means they show how wide the memory bus is.

    What you should really be looking at is the Memory Bandwidth, which is the memory clock speed in this snapshot^^

    Oh yes? I was searching 256 bit because some users say that 256 is better for games, isn't it?

    Yes, 256 bit is supposed to be faster but I would still buy the GTX 950, probably because its nvidia and that company makes quality stuff.

    BSxbzRO.png

    To be honest the difference is not huge, so its up to you.

    Thanks for this :) However 960 is too much for me now :/ But this picture helps me a lot :thumbup:

    Well I can't see here the AMD video adapters are the cheaper ones in this chart: http://videocardbenchmark.net/gpu_value.html

    An AMD Card, knew it ;)

    PS: Ignore the Memory bus 256 or 128 bit. They are just channels, which means they show how wide the memory bus is.

    What you should really be looking at is the Memory Bandwidth, which is the memory clock speed in this snapshot^^

    I can't see here the effective memory bandwidth in this table. But sure the bandwidth is what in the end counts.

    The effective memory clockspeed is most likely just multiplied with the correct factor for GDDR5: X4

    So you can assume the adapter with 256Bit memory interface has almost double memory bandwidth.

    Finally the table of Passmark is probably also not necessary the right performance index. It does obviously always depend what you measure and how you do weight each measure. If their test does only slightly make use of the memory bandwidth you want see the advantage of an 256Bit interface. However in another D3D application it could have effect.

    Oh I didn't know these things... Okay :thumbup:

  21. Posted · Report reply

    Thanks a lot @QueNNch :D

    PS: Ignore the Memory bus 256 or 128 bit. They are just channels, which means they show how wide the memory bus is.

    What you should really be looking at is the Memory Bandwidth, which is the memory clock speed in this snapshot^^

    Oh yes? I was searching 256 bit because some users say that 256 is better for games, isn't it?

  22. Posted · Report reply

    @QueNNch thanks for your suggestion :thumbup:

    For the card I have to try it in another computer to understand the real problem. In fact when I was in gaming (cod4) my screen become red and my pc got stuck. Then I boot it and when It finished to load the windows 7 logo

    win7boot0.jpg

    The screen become all black, I suggest it was burned, but it can also be a driver problem(even if I didn't change anythind in the last weeks). The GPU was a Sapphire ATI HD6870 1Gb GDDR5

    81hkodXP5NL._SL1500_.jpg

    EDIT: @QueNNch yea the price is too high :D

  23. Posted · Report reply

    Thanks for all the answers, I really appreciate it :)

    @Naltamer14 Nice image (maybe I can try with my burned graphics card :P ) yea, the second is better than first, Thanks you :)

    @*V*-The Entertainer yea R7 370 should be a good choice for games. I didn't know about Turbo core, thanks for this new info :thumbup:

    @Ninja Thanks for the table, very usefull :) For the power consumption of course, or my parents throw me out of the house And at last, thanks for the tip about direct3d :)

    @Mc.Joker I looked for AMD bacause, as you said, is cheaper, but your Nvidia card seems very good, I add it in my list xD

  24. Posted · Report reply

    Hey guys, I need a help; My graphics card has burned :thumbdown: So I have to buy another one, but I want one for gaming, maybe under 160 (max170) euro, I saw on many forums and I made an idea about these:

    Radeon R9 270X

    Bus: 256 bit

    productive process: 28nmFreq.

    Core: 1,050 MHz

    Transistor: 2.800 mln

    Shader: 1.280

    Memory: GDDR5

    DirectX: 11.2

    frequency Memory: 1,400 MHz

    TDP: 180 W

    Radeon R7 370 2GB

    Bus: 256 bit

    productive process: 28nm

    Freq. Core: 975 MHz

    Transistor: 2,800 mln

    Shader: 1,024 cores

    Memory: GDDR5

    DirectX: 12

    Freq. Memory: 1,400 MHz

    TDP: 110 W

    I'd like to know which parameters a graphics card for gaming should have high(ex. core speed, bus,...) :saint:

    Thanks for the attention :thumbsup: